Hapie turns your delivery method into playbooks that AI agents run and your experts approve. Win work with evidence-based proposals, deliver with a smaller team and a fraction of the rework, and keep earning from playbooks that get better with every client. Your method stays your IP.
40 to 45%
delivery margin, from 25 to 30% on a traditional programme
6 to 8
core team on a 500-interface migration, from 14 to 18
12 to 15%
effort on rework, from 30 to 35%
15 to 20%
faster again on the second programme of the same pattern
Rates are under pressure, clients want fixed prices, and the same three things eat the margin on every programme: rework that nobody bills for, senior people spent on work a well-guided junior could do, and pre-sales effort that wins one bid in four. Coding assistants made individual developers faster and changed none of this, because the loss is in the handoffs and the verification, not the typing.
Rework
Traditional programme:
30 to 35% of effort, mostly unbillable, discovered in UAT
On Hapie:
12 to 15%. Defects fail the evidence gate in minutes, not in UAT in weeks
Senior dependency
Traditional programme:
Quality tracks seniority. Juniors need supervision; seniors are the bottleneck
On Hapie:
Juniors deliver inside the playbook; seniors approve. Consistent quality regardless of who is on the team
Team size
Traditional programme:
14 to 18 on a 500-interface migration
On Hapie:
6 to 8, with agents doing analysis, build, test and documentation
Pre-sales cost
Traditional programme:
Senior architects writing proposals from memory, estimates by gut
On Hapie:
Proposals grounded in your track records, every claim linked to evidence, estimates from data
Knowledge
Traditional programme:
Leaves with the people who rotate off
On Hapie:
Captured in your playbook and carried to the next client
Programme two
Traditional programme:
Starts from zero
On Hapie:
15 to 20% faster; the playbook already knows the pattern
Move the sliders to your practice. The model applies the illustrative ratios above to your inputs; it does not know your rates, so it shows indices and percentages, not money. Bring the real figures to the discovery call and we will do it properly.
How to read it.
The cost index treats your current delivery cost as 100. Capacity is how many programmes the same people can run when agents do analysis, build, test and documentation. Margin points are added to your current delivery margin.
Enterprises make vendors work inside their environment, and they will not grant a bidder access to their Jira. That is why Hapie's pre-sales use runs entirely on your side. Point it at the RFP and your own track records, and it produces a proposal in which every claim links to evidence you actually have, with estimates drawn from programmes you actually delivered. When you win, the proposal converts into the delivery plan without a handoff. When you lose, the reason is captured too.
Who writes it
Today
Two or three senior people, pulled off billable work
On Hapie:
Agents draft from your track records; one senior person reviews and signs
Claims
Today:
Prose from memory, occasionally optimistic
On Hapie:
Every claim linked to a delivery, a playbook or a measured result; unsupported claims are rejected by the gate
Estimate
Today:
Gut plus a contingency
On Hapie:
Derived from track records of comparable programmes, with the provenance attached
If you win
Today:
Re-plan from scratch
On Hapie:
The response becomes the programme plan in Jira on day one
If you lose
Today:
Nobody remembers why
On Hapie:
Reason captured, next bid adjusts
Programme two
Today:
Starts from zero
On Hapie:
15 to 20% faster; the playbook already knows the pattern
This is the commercial heart of it. A playbook carries the rules, the patterns and the standards a senior architect would apply; the evidence gate refuses anything that breaks them; and a named senior approves. A junior developer working inside that delivers what the senior would have, and the senior's time goes to approving and to the hard decisions. That is not replacing seniors. It is the only way to grow a practice faster than you can hire them.
Why they adopt
Margin. An SI's delivery margin is the number its partners are measured on, and Hapie moves it by 10 to 15 points illustratively, with the same people. This is not a productivity tool bought by developers; it is a margin tool bought by practice leaders.
Why they stay
The playbook and its track record. Every programme adds corrections and outcomes to the SI's own asset inside Hapie. Leaving means abandoning the accumulated method, and the track record is what wins the next bid.
How revenue scales
Subscription per practice plus usage per programme delivered, so revenue grows with the SI's own pipeline. Each SI brings several clients' programmes; each client programme can pull the enterprise onto Hapie for its other vendors. One side feeds the other.
Customer Zero: NexGen Architects, a MuleSoft strategic partner, runs its own client programmes on Hapie. The first measured numbers on this site come from there.
The reason SIs hesitate to put their method into a platform is fear of losing it. So the ownership is explicit. Hapie owns the runtime and the playbook format; you own everything you write in it, the track record it accumulates, and the right to take it with you. Your playbooks can also sit on top of Hapie's platform playbooks, so you start from fifteen years of MuleSoft and Salesforce practice and add what makes your firm different.
